JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Dota 2: TEAM VISION v BoomBoys (BO3) - The International Playoffs
TEAM VISION
ENTRY
78¢
RESULT
+28%
CALLER
@.magsasaka
PLACED
2026-08-20 · 06:11 UTC
Nº 0001596R
WIN
+28%
409790492704
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinDota 2: TEAM VISION v BoomBoys (BO3) - The International Playoffs: TEAM VISION, +28%Market ↗
Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.
Original Discord message, word for word
Esports - Dota 2 What will happen in TEAM VISION vs BoomBoys (BO3)? Taking: TEAM VISION to win the series - YES odds: 78c Reasoning: TEAM VISION has the stronger five-man roster and beat this BoomBoys lineup 2-1 earlier this month. Game 1 was still close at 5:11, but TEAM VISION led 3-2 with a small core farm advantage and all towers standing. Their Lone Druid and Dark Seer lineup gives them strong tempo and objective pressure, while BoomBoys has enough teamfight control to keep this below a maximum-confidence call. #NFA #DYOR https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-859109
Record
- Posted
- Thu, 20 Aug 2026 06:11:00 UTC
- Event start
- Thu, 20 Aug 2026 05:50:00 UTC
- Entry
- 78¢ Entry 78¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.
Outcome
Won: the market resolved for TEAM VISION.
gamma POLY-859109 "Match Winner" outcome "TEAM VISION" price 1 uma=resolved closed=true
graded Sat, 22 Aug 2026 09:46:15 UTC
Verification details
- Message id
1539879409790492704open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)- Market
POLY-859109jup.ag ↗- Capture
- auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Dota 2: TEAM VISION vs BoomBoys (BO3) - The International Playoffs"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-859109: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (77.5c, 44s old); entry is the caller's stated 78¢; the order book at the post moment reads 77.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
#1596). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.