Benfica -1.5 · Sport Lisboa e Benfica v Aarhus GF (win)

Leaderboard

f.solcall #1514

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

Sport Lisboa e Benfica v Aarhus GF

Benfica -1.5

ENTRY

66¢

RESULT

+52%

CALLER

@f.sol

PLACED

2026-08-20 · 12:36 UTC

Nº 0001514R

WIN

+52%

356085891184

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedwinMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Sport Lisboa e Benfica – Aarhus GF Going for spread -1.5 at 66 cent Benfica is always used to play internationally imo they on a way other lvl then their oppenent so I expect them to w def with 2 or even more goals difference the odd has risen already a bit it’s not the best but still free imo I played on another slip even -2.5 kek if u want better odds but it’s def riskier #nfa

Record

Posted: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 12:36:14 UTC
Event start: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 19:00:00 UTC
Entry: 66¢ Entry 66¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.As stated by the caller: this market has no order book to price the entry against. The result is still resolved from market data.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Benfica -1.5.

derived from exact-score "Sport Lisboa e Benfica 3 - 1 Aarhus GF" (uel-ben-agf-2026-08-20-exact-score): margin 2 vs -1.5 (European, no push)

graded Sat, 22 Aug 2026 22:51:08 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1539976356085891184 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-854453 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa, market auto-discovered + parsed side; event "Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. Aarhus GF"; market auto-discovered from the matchup line "Benfica vs Aarhus GF": 2 fixtures list these clubs (two-legged tie); only "Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. Aarhus GF" starts within 4 days of the post; entry is the caller's stated 66¢, unverified: this side has no market of its own on the event, so no order book exists to price it against (the result is still derived from the fixture's exact-score market); CORRECTED Aug 22: side was the bare "spread -1.5" — the message names Benfica as the team expected to win by 2+ ("I expect them to w def with 2 or even more goals difference"), so the line is Benfica's. The grader had defaulted a team-less line to the away side and scored Aarhus's margin; regraded on Benfica's (snk flagged it); REGRADE REQUESTED 2026-08-22: previous verdict "loss" cleared — bare 'spread -1.5' was graded on the away team's margin; side corrected to Benfica -1.5 (3-1 covers by two)

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1514). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.