JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Fulham FC v Chelsea FC
both teams to score
ENTRY
65¢
RESULT
+54%
CALLER
@therealone78
PLACED
2026-08-17 · 19:00 UTC
Nº 0001391R
WIN
+54%
847838474241
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinFulham FC v Chelsea FC: both teams to score, +54%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-831378 i'm choosing both team to score at 65c both teams are good in scoring goals #nfa

Record

Posted
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:00:19 UTC
Event start
Mon, 24 Aug 2026 19:00:00 UTC
Entry
65¢ Entry 65¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.As stated by the caller: this market has no order book to price the entry against. The result is still resolved from market data.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for both teams to score.

derived from exact-score "Fulham FC 2 - 3 Chelsea FC" (epl-ful-che-2026-08-24-exact-score): score 2-3, both scored: true

graded Mon, 24 Aug 2026 20:57:30 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538985847838474241 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-831378 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Fulham FC vs. Chelsea FC"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-831378: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); entry is the caller's stated 65¢, unverified: this side has no market of its own on the event, so no order book exists to price it against (the result is still derived from the fixture's exact-score market)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1391). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.