JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Brentford FC v Tottenham Hotspur FC
tottenham no
ENTRY
65¢
RESULT
+54%
CALLER
@therealone78
PLACED
2026-08-17 · 18:53 UTC
Nº 0001390R
WIN
+54%
251884699780
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinBrentford FC v Tottenham Hotspur FC: tottenham no, +54%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-818999 im choosing tottenham to win NO at 65c both teams are strong and they can score but tottenahm wont be able to win after the 7-0 brentford #nfa

Record

Posted
Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:53:58 UTC
Event start
Sat, 22 Aug 2026 16:30:00 UTC
Entry
65¢ Entry 65¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for tottenham no.

gamma POLY-818999 "Tottenham Hotspur FC" outcome "No" price 0.9995 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sat, 22 Aug 2026 18:29:15 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538984251884699780 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-818999 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Brentford FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-818999: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); entry is the caller's stated 65¢; the order book at the post moment reads 64.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1390). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.