JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Watford FC v Southampton FC
Southampton FC
ENTRY
50¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@builder007
PLACED
2026-08-16 · 12:34 UTC
Nº 0001389R
LOSS
-100%
312074059796
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedlossWatford FC v Southampton FC: Southampton FC, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Watford FC vs. Southampton FC I’m choosing Southampton FC to win 50c Reason - better quality of players #nfa https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-788975

Record

Posted
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 12:34:17 UTC
Event start
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 12:30:00 UTC
Entry
50¢ Entry 50¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-788975 "Southampton FC" outcome "Yes" price 0 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:11:59 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538526312074059796 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-788975 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Watford FC vs. Southampton FC"; boarded from review queue (was: linked POLY-788975: no parseable side and no single outcome mentioned); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (48.5c, 7s old); entry is the caller's stated 50¢; the order book at the post moment reads 48.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1389). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.