Over 8.5 · St. Louis Cardinals v Cincinnati Reds (loss)

Leaderboard

vince.call #1378

JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1

VERIFIED CALL

St. Louis Cardinals v Cincinnati Reds

Over 8.5

ENTRY

70¢

RESULT

-100%

CALLER

@vince.

PLACED

2026-08-17 · 18:20 UTC

Nº 0001378R

LOSS

-100%

776312000612

JUPCALLERS.FUN

Post to XSave

VerifiedlossMarket ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

St. Louis Cardinals vs. Cincinnati Reds Over 8.5 70c #nfa **Confidence 8/10** https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-498285

Record

Posted: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 18:20:17 UTC
Event start: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:40:00 UTC
Entry: 70¢ Entry 70¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-498285 "O/U 8.5" outcome "Over" price 0.0005 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Tue, 18 Aug 2026 01:16:03 UTC

Verification details

Message id: 1538975776312000612 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market: POLY-498285 jup.ag ↗
Capture: auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "St. Louis Cardinals vs. Cincinnati Reds"; boarded from review queue (was: no order book for "Over 8.5": nobody is selling, so the shown price is a placeholder, not a price — a call needs a tradable ask); entry is the caller's stated 70¢; the order book at the post moment reads 73.5¢ (mid at post time (ask unrecoverable this long after the post)), which is not a buyable ask, so the stated figure stands

Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1378). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.