JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Glasgow Rangers v St Mirren FC
Glasgow Rangers
ENTRY
74¢
RESULT
+35%
CALLER
@builder007
PLACED
2026-08-16 · 14:32 UTC
Nº 0001272R
WIN
+35%
959356428368
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinGlasgow Rangers v St Mirren FC: Glasgow Rangers, +35%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Glasgow Rangers vs. St Mirren FC Pick - Glasgow Rangers @74c Reason - Rangers is a better , and need the win to save loosing streak. Also edges in H2H against mirren #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-839111

Record

Posted
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 14:32:05 UTC
Event start
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:00:00 UTC
Entry
74¢ Entry 74¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.As stated by the caller: this market has no order book to price the entry against. The result is still resolved from market data.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Glasgow Rangers.

gamma POLY-839111 "Glasgow Rangers" outcome "Yes" price 1 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Mon, 17 Aug 2026 12:05:51 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538555959356428368 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-839111 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "Glasgow Rangers vs. St Mirren FC"; entry is the caller's stated 74¢, unverified: this side has no market of its own on the event, so no order book exists to price it against (the result is still derived from the fixture's exact-score market); SIDE CANONICALISED 2026-08-17: "- Glasgow Rangers" -> "Glasgow Rangers" (same bet, proper outcome name)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1272). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.