Leaderboardf.solcall #1260
JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
SK Brann v Hamarkameratene
both teams to score
ENTRY
60¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@f.sol
PLACED
2026-08-16 · 10:00 UTC
Nº 0001260R
LOSS
-100%
600313008209
JUPCALLERS.FUN
Post to XSave
VerifiedlossSK Brann v Hamarkameratene: both teams to score, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

SK Brann – Ham Kam Going for both teams to score at 60 cent Brann at home is fav here but i expect it to be a hot match since it’s rank 7 against 9 both have same points just goal difference from Brann better imo both gonna score at least 1 cus branns defense not the best as well. #nfa

Record

Posted
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 10:00:27 UTC
Event start
Sun, 16 Aug 2026 15:00:00 UTC
Entry
60¢ Entry 60¢, the number the caller wrote. The market briefly showed better odds, and a call never pays more than its caller claimed.As stated by the caller: this market has no order book to price the entry against. The result is still resolved from market data.

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

derived from exact-score "SK Brann 3 - 0 Hamarkameratene" (nor-bra-ham-2026-08-16-exact-score): score 3-0, both scored: false

graded Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:05:24 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538487600313008209 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-792783 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa, market auto-discovered + parsed side; event "SK Brann vs. Hamarkameratene"; boarded from review queue (was: re-opened Aug 16: a real call, wrongly dismissed. Matchup discovery could not match the caller's "Ham Kam" to Polymarket's "Hamarkameratene" (syllable abbreviation), and the Aug 16 chatter triage then mislabelled it because its price test did not read the singular "60 cent". Both fixed in the pipeline.); market auto-discovered from the matchup line "SK Brann vs Ham Kam": single active match "SK Brann vs. Hamarkameratene"; entry is the caller's stated 60¢, unverified: this side has no market of its own on the event, so no order book exists to price it against (the result is still derived from the fixture's exact-score market)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1260). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.