Leaderboardnerianaa_call #1242
JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
UFC 330: Vicente Luque v Tresean Gore (Middleweight, Early Prelims)
Vicente Luque
ENTRY
51¢
RESULT
-100%
CALLER
@nerianaa_
PLACED
2026-08-15 · 23:02 UTC
Nº 0001242R
LOSS
-100%
039390347315
JUPCALLERS.FUN
Post to XSave
VerifiedlossUFC 330: Vicente Luque v Tresean Gore (Middleweight, Early Prelims): Vicente Luque, -100%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

UFC 330: Vicente Luque vs. Tresean Gore (Middleweight, Early Prelims) #NFA https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-783650 I have at 51c Vincente Luque to win, practically same height, weight, reach etc as his opponent. I got him to win because his ground game is way more technical than Tresean Gore although that guy is also very skilled on the ground Vincente has way more experience, insane striker in Muay Thai so expecting leg and body kicks haven’t checked his Karate but apparently very good too so most likely very flexible for head kicks and not only a BJJ black belt but Black belt in Luta Livre Tresean does some too like Muay Thai and Wrestling but nothing like Vincente

Record

Posted
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 23:02:34 UTC
Event start
Sat, 15 Aug 2026 21:00:00 UTC
Entry
51¢

Outcome

Lost: the market resolved against this pick.

gamma POLY-783650 "Vicente Luque vs. Tresean Gore" outcome "Vicente Luque" price 0 uma=resolved closed=true

graded Sun, 16 Aug 2026 10:07:14 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1538322039390347315 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-783650 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link + parsed side; event "UFC 330: Vicente Luque vs. Tresean Gore (Middleweight, Early Prelims)"; boarded from review queue (was: re-opened Aug 16: this is a real call ("I have at 51c Vicente Luque to win"), dismissed as chatter because a comment 86s later boarded on the same fight. The chatter guard no longer touches a message carrying a link and a price.); hindsight guard cleared by the order book at post time (50.5c, 24s old); entry provisionally from the caller's stated 51¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding)
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1242). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.