JUPITER PREDICTIONSSEASON 1
VERIFIED CALL
Brownsburg (Doubles): Broady/Wendelken v Lammons/Withrow
Lammons/Withrow
ENTRY
87¢
RESULT
+15%
CALLER
@0xzagh
PLACED
2026-08-14 · 01:23 UTC
Nº 0001101R
WIN
+15%
603740438550
JUPCALLERS.FUN
VerifiedwinBrownsburg (Doubles): Broady/Wendelken v Lammons/Withrow: Lammons/Withrow, +15%Market ↗

Verified: message id, word-for-word text, market link and entry price all captured when the call was posted.

Original Discord message, word for word

Brownsburg Challenger (Doubles): Broady/Wendelken vs Lammons/Withrow Lammons/Withrow WIN Reasoning: Massive doubles specialist edge and elite ATP tour experience at 50c value. #nfa #dyor https://jup.ag/prediction/POLY-845760

Record

Posted
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:23:00 UTC
Event start
Fri, 14 Aug 2026 02:10:00 UTC
Entry
87¢ Entry 87¢, read from the market at the moment of the call; the caller wrote 50¢.

Outcome

Won: the market resolved for Lammons/Withrow.

gamma POLY-845760 "Brownsburg (Doubles): Broady/Wendelken vs Lammons/Withrow" outcome "Lammons/Withrow" price 0.9955 uma=proposed closed=false

graded Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:49:18 UTC
Verification details
Message id
1537632603740438550 open in Discord ↗ (requires server membership)
Market
POLY-845760 jup.ag ↗
Capture
auto-captured: #nfa + jup.ag link; side matched to outcome of "Brownsburg (Doubles): Broady/Wendelken vs Lammons/Withrow"; side inferred from the linked event: only "Lammons/Withrow" is referenced outside the matchup phrase; entry provisionally from the caller's stated 50¢ (order-book history unreachable at boarding); entry corrected 50¢ -> 87¢ (Aug 14): the market is untraded (13¢ bid against an 87¢ ask), so the 50¢ mid the caller quoted was never buyable and 87¢ is what the buy button charges
Think this is wrong (misattributed, wrong entry, wrong grade, duplicate, not a call)? Say so in #prediction-alpha-nfa and tag AG with this call id (#1101). Corrections are published, never silent: see methodology.